Revision u/s 263 - CIT himself has given a finding that the ...

CIT Rules Re-assessment Void Due to AO's Failures; Section 263 Jurisdiction Deemed Unjustified.

June 13, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Revision u/s 263 - CIT himself has given a finding that the re-assessment proceedings have not been correctly carried out and the AO has failed to fulfill his obligation and order is void - when the said order is void and did not stand in law, it cannot be held to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue - exercise of jurisdiction by the CIT u/s 263 is not justified

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - CIT himself has given a finding that the ...

CIT Rules Re-assessment Void Due to AO's Failures; Section 263 Jurisdiction Deemed Unjustified.

June 13, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal considered the validity of a scrutiny assessment conducted by an Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (Addl. CIT) under section 143(3) read with...

Jurisdiction by AO to suo-moto convert protective assessment into substantive assessment post completion of original assessment proceedings - Once the ld CIT(A) was...

Jurisdiction of CIT (A) while passing an order in appeal u/s 250 - Validity of assessment framed without issue of notice u/s. 143(2) - whether CIT (A) has exceeded his...

Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

Distinction between "lack of inquiry and inadequate inquiry" emphasized. Assessee underwent rigorous assessment proceedings with multiple notices and replies. AO...

Assumption of jurisdiction u/s 153A was challenged due to unexplained credit u/s 68. Share capital, being a liability, cannot be treated as an asset to invoke...

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

Reassessment proceedings were held invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax while issuing the notice u/s 148. The...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the assessment orders issued u/s 153C for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13 were beyond the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer...

Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - second revisional jurisdiction of Pr. CIT - Whether the AO (called second AO) has not conducted enquiry while framing re-assessment...

Reopening of assessment - Jurisdiction of AO - AO, Mumbai who has issued the notice u/s 148 was not having jurisdiction as only AO, Dehradun was having the jurisdiction...

ITAT quashed assessment order due to jurisdictional defect in notice issuance under Section 143(2). While ACIT had pecuniary jurisdiction to conduct assessment of...

Case involved revision u/s 263 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) setting aside assessment order regarding rent recovered from specified persons and treatment of...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Addition u/s 68 - unexplained share application money - Since the aforesaid exercise was carried out by the second AO in the reassessment...

ITAT adjudicated a tax assessment dispute regarding the validity of notice u/s 143(2). The tribunal found that the notice was issued to an incorrect/non-existing...

Quick Updates: