Retirement from service with immediate effect - petitioner being ...

Court Reviews IRS Officer's Damages Claim Post-Retirement u/r 56(j); Orders Must Not Rely on Inferences.

September 6, 2019

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

Retirement from service with immediate effect - petitioner being an IRS Officer - claim of damages - the order passed under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules cannot be adjudicated on the premise of inferences. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Retirement from service with immediate effect - petitioner being ...

Court Reviews IRS Officer's Damages Claim Post-Retirement u/r 56(j); Orders Must Not Rely on Inferences.

September 6, 2019

Case Laws Indian Laws HC

You may also like:

In the matter under review, the High Court dismissed the review petitions filed by the parties. The Court held that no grounds were established for seeking a review of...

Disallowing entire claim for leave encashment and post retirement medical benefit - the Assessee’s treatment of the liability in respect of the post retirement medical...

Appellate Tribunal held that the Assessing Officer failed to provide findings for rejecting assessee's claim of exemption as a startup from applicability of section...

Extinguishment of liability as per order of NCLT - challenge to order issued u/s 73 of the SGST/CGST Act 2017 - The High Court noted the NCLT order's explicit directive...

The review petition challenges the order imposing interest liability over the withheld amount and cost on the Managing Director. The court held that reviewing an order...

Deduction claimed u/s 57 against income returned u/s 56 - manner of apportioning assessee's expenses to earning income u/s 56 disputed - Revenue authorities rejecting...

The High Court considered the maintainability of a review petition based on a subsequent judgment and the condonation of a 619-day delay in filing the civil review...

Provision for post-retirement medical benefits to employees – post-retirement medical benefit is also a liability which gets attached to the company the moment, the...

Validity of review order - Period of limitation - It cannot be understood what prevented the Department from submitting before the Commissioner (Appeals) that the...

A review application is maintainable on (i) discovery of new and important evidence which could not be produced earlier despite due diligence, (ii) mistake or error...

Additions u/s 56(2)(ix) - Mesne profit / liquidated damages - Amount remained with assessee after cancellation of the said sale in terms of the decree order of the...

Interest granted u/s 28 of the Land Acquisition Act on enhanced compensation or compensation awarded by the reference court u/s 18, from the date of land possession till...

Entitlement to interest on IGST refund - In refund application petitioner has only claimed the integrated tax and not the interest on the same - The High court referred...

Validity of valuation u/s 56(2)(viib) was questioned. The Assessing Officer rejected the assessee's valuation report and framed the order based on actual figures, which...

Tribunal held that an order passed following binding precedents cannot be recalled or reviewed based on a subsequent contrary judgment of a higher court. Once an order...

Quick Updates: