Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - The appellant have given a cogent ...

Tax Penalty Waived u/s 78 Due to Honest Staff Error and Reasonable Explanation by Appellant.

May 5, 2020

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - The appellant have given a cogent explanation for the tax short paid, that they were not having competent staff and as such some errors occurred, it was not deliberate. Such explanation have not found to be untrue. - Penalty waived.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - The appellant have given a cogent ...

Tax Penalty Waived u/s 78 Due to Honest Staff Error and Reasonable Explanation by Appellant.

May 5, 2020

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Non-discharge of service tax - extended period invoked, service tax demanded - penalties imposed u/ss 77 and 78 of Finance Act, 1994 - appellant providing taxable...

Imposition of penalty u/s 78 - there was a bonafide error in not recording the amount in the ST-3 return is seems to be acceptable - penalty waived - AT

Penalty u/s 76, 77 & 78 - non-payment of service tax due to financial hardship - there was a reasonable cause and the case of the Appellant is covered by the provisions...

Penalty u/s 78 - non-discharge of service tax liability is not due to ulterior motive but due to financial difficulties that was faced by the appellant. In our view it...

Services rendered by appellant classified as works contract services, attracting service tax liability. Appellant failed to obtain service tax registration and pay...

Penalty u/s 78 of the FA, 1994 - appellant had correctly advised not to challenged the invocation of the extended period of limitation for recovery of service tax though...

Penalty u/s 76 & 78 - waiver of penalty u/s 80 - C&F Service - inclusion of reimbursements of expenses - there were divergent views on the issue - penalty waived - AT

Laible for penalty on delayed service tax or not – penalty under section 78 - there should be a mens rea on the part of the appellant to evade tax – there is no...

Penalty u/s 78 of FA - even if the appellant subsequently pays the amount on being pointed out by the department, along with interest, imposition of penalty under...

Demand of service tax from the Sub-contractor - Demand of service tax with interest confirmed - Levy of penalty u/s 77 & 78 waived invoking the provisions of section 80- AT

Levy of penalty u/s 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - No independent reasons have been given by the first appellate authority to confirm the penalty under Section 78 of the...

The assessee had not obtained and furnished the Audit Report from the Accountant within the due date. The Tribunal held that the levy of penalty u/s 271B is not...

Levy of penalty u/s 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 - evasion of service tax - appellant collected service tax from the service receivers but failed to deposit the...

Invokation of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 and immunity from penalty under Section 78 of the Act - Levy of service tax being an indirect tax mechanism hardship is...

Reduction of penalty u/s 78 of FA - non-payment of service tax - appellant has not recorded the said transactions in their specified records - Penalty reduced to 50% of...

Quick Updates: