Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2020 Year 2020 This

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Addition u/s ...


Reopening Assessment u/s 147 for Gifts from HUF Deemed Invalid; Difference of Opinion Not Allowed.

June 16, 2020

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Validity of reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Addition u/s 56(2)(v) - gifts received by the assessee from the HUF interpreted as the gift from the relatives - reopening the assessment on the same issue which was already considered by the AO and taken a view amounts to difference of opinion and on difference of opinion, reopening of assessment is not permissible

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reply to the audit objections - in fact AO applied his mind to the audit party objection and formed a clear opinion that there is no...

  2. The case pertains to the reopening of assessment u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act. The key points are: The department had already raised queries regarding the accumulation...

  3. The High Court held that the Assessing Officer cannot reopen the assessment u/s 147 merely based on a change of opinion. The assessee had fully and truly disclosed all...

  4. The ITAT quashed the reopening of assessment under section 147, finding it invalid on two grounds. First, the reasons recorded by the AO were vague and incomplete,...

  5. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reason to believe - there was tangible material before the AO to reopen the concluded assessment as the assessee is claiming huge...

  6. Reopening of assessment under s.147 challenged on grounds of invalid notice under s.143(2) and "change of opinion." ITAT held notice under s.143(2) was valid as return...

  7. Validity of reopening assessment u/s 147 - the reopening of assessment made by the AO on irrelevant facts and on a mere reason to suspect cannot survive. We hold that...

  8. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as Assessing Officer (AO) failed to record that assessee did not disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for...

  9. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was based on reasons to believe the difference between total cash sales and cash sales reflected in books. Held: Reopening was made only...

  10. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reopening after expiry of four years - Original assessment have been passed under section 143(3) on Dated 14.12.2011 and A.O. recorded...

  11. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was challenged. The Assessing Officer (AO) had disallowed 20% of total sundry creditors in the regular assessment u/s 143(3). The AO...

  12. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - in the present case, the ancestral property is owned by the assessee in the HUF status and so the appellant’s case was to be reopened...

  13. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Change of opinion - The reopening of the assessment is nothing but a mere change of opinion on the part of AO. If the AO could not...

  14. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was invalid as there was no failure by the assessee to disclose material facts. The assessment was reopened solely based on information...

  15. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - Period of limitation - The audit party is entitled to point out a factual error or omission in the assessment. reopening of the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates