Not accepting revised return of the petitioner in violation of ...

Petitioner Challenges Tax Return Rejection; Calls for Software Improvements u/s 139 to Align with Apex Court Directives.

December 8, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Not accepting revised return of the petitioner in violation of Section 139 - When the respondents have geared up to operate in the regime of electronic and faceless mode for conducting all its operations including the filing of returns document, hearing and assessment, it shall need to improvise the software and closely examine the difficulties experienced by the tax payers because of the limitation of the softwares which can easily be corrected to allow the revised return more particularly, when the law has been made quite clear by virtue of the direction of the Apex Court. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Not accepting revised return of the petitioner in violation of ...

Petitioner Challenges Tax Return Rejection; Calls for Software Improvements u/s 139 to Align with Apex Court Directives.

December 8, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 221 r.w.s. 140A - default of non-payment of taxes on due date - Provisions of Section 140A (3) can apply only when there is a self-assessment tax payable...

Refund claim - petitioner had not filed returns either u/s 139(1) or within the extended period u/s 139 (4) - Since the law mandates a particular thing to be done in a...

Section 80P deduction claim filed in a return submitted in response to notice u/s 142(1) is valid. The Income Tax Act does not mandate that the return must be filed u/ss...

Penalty u/s.271AAB - Belated filing of regular return after search - Penalty cannot be levied u/s.271AAB of the Act, in respect of income disclosed in regular return of...

Invalid return - Rejection of refund - mismatch in the figures of income returned and as reported in Form 26AS - Technically speaking, the AO has not passed an order u/s...

Validity of revised return filed vis-a-vis claims made thereunder - revised return treated as non-est - the appellant filed his original return otherwise than u/s 139(1)...

Cost of improvement - Exemption u/s 54 / 54EC - Even if a return is filed in terms of sub-section (4) of section 139 that would not dilute the infraction in not...

Revised return - original return of income was filed within time - Revised return is a loss return which should have been filed within the time specified u/s 139(3) of...

Rejection of rectification petition - turnover of the petitioner was erroneously reported in the GSTR 1 return - The High Court acknowledges the petitioner's claim...

Not accepting the revised return of income and disallowing the claim of loss - Submission of return for losses - there is no specific denial u/s 80 that the return filed...

Scope of section 80A(5) - Revised return was not permissible and revised return of revised return is not thought of by the legislature. Thus, u/s 139(5) once return is...

Notice u/s 143(2) - period of limitation - defective return filed u/s 139(1) - upon such defects being removed, the return would relate back to the date of filing of the...

Deduction u/s 54F and 54B - investments were been made after the due date for filing of return of income u/s 139(1) but before the filing of return u/s 139(4) - when the...

Refund claim - effect of name change - defective return u/s 139(9) or not - in whose name the refund should be issued? - PAN database correction would certainly indicate...

Validity of manual revised returns filed - scheme of demerger approved - scheme of arrangement approved by NCLT required Petitioner and Hind Lamps to file revised...

Quick Updates: