Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - when it is not established that the ...

No Proof of Loan or Deposit Leads to No Penalties Under Income Tax Act Sections 271D and 271E.

January 5, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - when it is not established that the assessee had taken loan or deposit, the question of further presumption that such loan or deposit was repaid during the year under consideration was without any basis or material on record - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - when it is not established that the ...

No Proof of Loan or Deposit Leads to No Penalties Under Income Tax Act Sections 271D and 271E.

January 5, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Violation of the provisions of Sections 269SS and 269T - scope of the term "loan" and "deposit" - Penalty u/s 271D and 271E - amount received on account of share...

The case pertains to penalty proceedings u/s 271D for violating Section 269SS and Section 271E of the Income Tax Act. The assessee received Rs. 18 lakh from a trustee...

Penalty u/s 271D or 271E - Penalty u/s.271D or 271E of the Act is concerned, those are independent proceedings and having nothing to do with assessment proceedings or...

Penalty u/s 271D and penalty u/s. 271E - Default u/s 269SS and u/s 269T - Loan/deposits taken/paid by the assessee in cash is more than Rs.20,000/- - after evaluating...

Penalty u/s 271D & 271E - allegation of cash loan having been taken/repaid - The ITAT underscored the principle that penalties under Sections 271D and 271E for...

Penalty u/s 271D read with section 269SS and Penalty u/s 271E read with section 269D - cash transaction - Merely on the regular balance interest paid the transaction...

ITAT quashed penalties under sections 271D and 271E for accepting cash loans of Rs. 17,00,000 in violation of section 269SS. Tribunal considered assessee's circumstances...

Penalty imposed u/s 271D & 271E - default u/s 269SS & 269T - CIT(A) deleted the penalty holding that general entries leading to assignment of debt does not attract...

The case involved a challenge to penalty orders u/ss 271D and 271E before the Appellate Tribunal. The issue revolved around the reassessment proceedings being quashed,...

Levy of penalty u/s.271D/271E - transaction by passing a journal entry - proof of reasonable cause u/s 273B - the business constraint and exigency and administrative...

The ITAT held that for penalty u/s 271D for contravention of section 269SS, recording satisfaction by AO is mandatory. Citing Jaya Laxmi Rice Mills case, it emphasized...

Penalty levied u/s. 271D - transactions through journal entries - assessee shall be deemed to have had reasonable cause to receive the deposits/loans through journal...

Penalty u/s.271D & 271E - Period of limitation for imposing penalty u/s 275(1)(c) - he discussion by the AO in the assessment order and making reference to the Addl. CIT...

Penalty u/s 271D and 271E - creation/ assignment of debt and liabilities vide journal entries - These entries arise in the normal course of day to day business...

Penalty imposed u/s 271D and 271E - the availing and re–payment of loan through book entries was prior to 12th June 2012. Therefore non–compliance to the provisions of...

Quick Updates: