Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights February 2024 Year 2024 This

Validity of assessment order - The tribunal questioned the ...


Tribunal Questions Fairness of Assessment Process; Deletes Additions Due to Business Expense Validity.

February 13, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Validity of assessment order - The tribunal questioned the effectiveness and fairness of the assessment procedure, particularly the timing and practicality of issuing notices and summonses to recipients across different locations within a short timeframe. It criticized the Assessing Officer's dormant approach followed by hurried completion of proceedings. - The ITAT held that, we are satisfied that these expenses were incurred for the business purposes during the course of business. The assessee has submitted all basic details. - Additions deleted.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The assessment reopening u/s 147 read with Section 148 was found to be unsustainable due to the lack of independent application of mind by the Commissioner of Income Tax...

  2. The CIT(A) partly allowed and restricted the addition on account of commission expenses at 0.25% as compared to 2% adopted by the Assessing Officer. The coordinate bench...

  3. Assessment u/s 153A - Addition based on the valuation report - completed assessment - nature of material found in the course of search which led to impugned additions -...

  4. The Appellate Tribunal considered the issue of condonation of delay in filing appeals, which exceeded 400 days, due to unexplained cash deposits and protective additions...

  5. The assessee's contentions were upheld by the Tribunal regarding various additions made by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal ruled that the RTGS transfer from the...

  6. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) adjudicated on various additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) as unexplained/bogus credits or trading liabilities. The...

  7. Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

  8. The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the assessing officer against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, holding that no substantial question of law...

  9. Additions on various grounds during post search Assessment u/s 153A - The ITAT's decision showcases a detailed analysis of each issue, balancing the need for legal...

  10. The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

  11. The Appellate Tribunal held that the addition u/s 56(2)(vii) or 28(iv) was unjustified, as the purchase was made with consideration, cheques were given to sellers with...

  12. In the ITAT Delhi case, the Appellate Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee on two key issues. Firstly, regarding unexplained cash deposits u/s 68, the AO's failure to...

  13. Assessment u/s 153A - addition made in respect of completed assessment in absence of any incriminating material - The tribunal found that the additions made to the...

  14. Protective assessment/addition - No substantive assessment/addition in the hands of other assessee - It is therefore a case where no substantive additions have been made...

  15. Protective addition made by Assessing Officer was not sustainable as substantive addition did not survive in concluded assessment proceedings of related party. CIT(A)...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates