Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights April 2024 Year 2024 This

Validity Of Order passed u/s 73 - cryptic order - The High Court ...

Case Laws     GST

April 25, 2024

Validity Of Order passed u/s 73 - cryptic order - The High Court found merit in the petitioner's arguments regarding the inadequacy of the impugned order. It observed that the proper officer had failed to consider the detailed replies furnished by the petitioner, instead issuing a generic finding of no proper reply/explanation. The Court emphasized that the proper officer's duty was to assess the replies on their merit before forming an opinion. By neglecting to do so, the officer had not fulfilled this obligation and had not applied their mind to the petitioner's submissions. The matter was remitted to the proper officer for re-adjudication.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Wrongful availment and passing on of input tax credit, wrongful availment of IGST refund under Advance Authorisation scheme. Constitutional validity of Notification No....

  2. Validity of notice issued u/s 73 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 challenged due to non-consideration of petitioner's reply, violating principles of natural...

  3. Validity of demand of service tax - The case involved appeals against an order regarding service tax demands and penalties. The Appellate Tribunal addressed multiple...

  4. Issue of SCN and payment of penalty - Clarification regarding the provisions of Section 73, 76 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994 and Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944

  5. Quantum of levy of penalty - petitioner points out that 100% penalty was imposed although the show cause notice was issued u/s 73 - The High Court held that, it is clear...

  6. Validity of SCN issued u/s 73 of the CGST Act, 2017 - since the proceeding has been initiated under Section 73 of the Act, the very provision of Section 73 of the Act...

  7. The High Court examined whether proper show cause notices were issued before passing impugned orders u/s 73(9) of the State GST Act. It held that the summary of show...

  8. Failure to produce supporting documents before audit team does not constitute suppression of facts to invoke extended period of limitation u/s 73(1) of Finance Act, 1994....

  9. Dispute regarding non-payment/short payment of service tax, tax demand and interest u/ss 73(2) and 75, penalties u/ss 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, and extended...

  10. The Delhi High Court reviewed a case concerning excess Input Tax Credit claimed by a taxpayer by comparing GSTR-2A with GSTR-3B. The court noted the lack of cooperation...

  11. Validity of determination of GST liability (demand) u/s 73(1) - Rejection of the compounding application - Eligibility for composition scheme u/s 10(2)(a) - The High...

  12. The case pertains to the jurisdiction of impugned orders under the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017, and the time limitation u/s 73 and Section 44 of the Act. The key points are:...

  13. Restriction on Benefit of reduction / Nil rate of penalty - Applicability of Section 73(11) or 73(8) - assessee had paid the tax within thirty days from the issue of...

  14. Recovery of excess amount collected as service tax - Although show cause notice invoked the provisions of Section 73-A of the Act, but the adjudicating authority has not...

  15. Release of freezed petitioner's bank account - The order of provisional attachment was made not during pendency of any proceedings under Sections 62 or 63 or 64 or 67 or...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates