Demand regarding disparity between e-way bills and GSTR 3B ...

E-way bills & GSTR 3B disparity for 2018-21. Non-taxable supplies caused mismatch. Remit ₹3.5cr, submit docs for reconsideration.

Case Laws GST

July 16, 2024

Demand regarding disparity between e-way bills and GSTR 3B returns for 2018-19 to 2020-21 assessment periods. Petitioner stated disparity due to non-taxable supplies in e-way bills portal. Supporting documents not annexed to reply. Respondent did not refer to ITC-04 returns. Petitioner could have provided comprehensive explanation. Order set aside on condition of remitting Rs. 3,50,00,000/- towards disputed tax demand within six weeks and permitted to submit reply with relevant documents. Petition disposed of.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Demand regarding disparity between e-way bills and GSTR 3B ...

E-way bills & GSTR 3B disparity for 2018-21. Non-taxable supplies caused mismatch. Remit ₹3.5cr, submit docs for reconsideration.

Case Laws GST

July 16, 2024

You may also like:

Petitioners challenged adjudication order passed u/s 73(9) of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017. Court noted Rs. 3,96,08,142/- was reversible as petitioners availed ITC by filing...

Extension of date for filing return in FORM GSTR-3B for the month of April, 2018

The court held that the petitioner was denied the principles of natural justice by not being given a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits regarding...

Challenge to assessment order and rectification order for assessment year 2018-19 - mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A/GSTR-2B - order challenged on grounds of...

Petitioner challenged impugned orders, recovery notices and bank attachment notice due to mismatch between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A. Court accepted petitioner's contention of...

Time limit for availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) - whether GSTR-3B is a return u/s 39(1) of GST Act - Held No - press release dated 18th October 2018 could be said to be...

The High Court found the order passed by the authority to be violative of principles of natural justice as it was a non-speaking order that failed to address the...

Petitioner challenged order u/s 74 of TNGST Act, 2017 for assessment year 2017-18 due to mismatch between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A regarding input tax credit....

One-day delay in filing GSTR-3B for September 2020 led to reversal of ITC. Petitioner filed GSTR-3B on 23.10.2020, one day late. Respondent issued Form GST DRC-01A on 22....

Petition challenging adjudication order u/s 73(9) of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 for reversing ITC availed in GSTR-3B filed after prescribed time limit u/s 16(4). Court noted...

Validity of assessment order - mismatch between the GSTR 3B returns filed by the petitioner and the auto-populated GSTR 2A returns - The High court acknowledged the...

Simultaneous investigation by the Central and State GST authorities - the period of enquiry as far as Central tax authority is concerned is from July, 2017 to June, 2018...

Rectification of mistake that has been crept in GSTR-3B - Whether the return in Form GSTR-3B is a return u/s 39 - The petitioner is permitted to rectify GSTR 3B...

Levy of GST - Place of supply - Tax imposed on exhibition services received by the petitioner in non-taxable territory from the person located in non-taxable territory...

Seizure order for detention of goods due to absence of State E-way Bill was challenged. The Court held that at the time of interception, the Central E-way Bill under GST...

Quick Updates: