HC allowed the petition. It held that non-granting of ...

Opportunity for Cross-Examination Mandatory in CGST Penalty Cases: HC Allows Writ.

January 21, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

HC allowed the petition. It held that non-granting of opportunity to cross-examine witnesses whose statements were relied upon by the Adjudicating Authority to impose penalty u/s 74(9) of the CGST Act violated principles of natural justice. The HC observed that Section 107(11) of the Act does not empower the Appellate Authority to remand the case for such violations, necessitating invoking writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC allowed the petition. It held that non-granting of ...

Opportunity for Cross-Examination Mandatory in CGST Penalty Cases: HC Allows Writ.

January 21, 2025

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by...

Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of Cross-Examination Opportunity - Reliance of statement of third party - The High Court noted that the petitioner did...

Principles of natural justice - rejection of cross-examination - The petitioner has approached this Court prematurely as the respondents have only rejected the request...

Violation of principles of natural justice - opportunity for cross-examination. Evidentiary value of statements recorded u/s 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be...

Misdeclaration of description and value - Validity of test report - Cross examination of Chemical Examiner - In the present matter, refusal to allow cross-examination of...

Clandestine removal demand based on electrical consumption was challenged. Average electricity consumption for certain periods was calculated. Cross-examination of...

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside the impugned order and remanded the cases back to the adjudicating authority. The appellants...

Seeking cross-examination of two persons whose statements were relied upon while issuing the SCN - Cross-examination allowed - HC

Penalty under Customs Broker Licensing Regulation (CBLR) 2013 for violation of Regulation 17(9). Appellant not directly involved in act or omission by authorized...

Denial of cross-examination process of witness - ACIT restricted cross examination process by denying the questions asked by the Petitioner during cross examination -...

Right of the accused for cross-examination of parties, whose statement has been relied upon - In the writ appeal, while acknowledging that cross-examination is a part of...

Dishonor of Cheque - seeking cross examination of the complainant officer of the bank - In the present application the recall, re-cross examination of the complainant is...

Clandestine removal - denial of opportunity of cross-examination of witnesses - The only question is at what stage would he be entitled to cross-examine the witnesses -...

Violation of principles of natural justice - From the statutory provision of section 138 B, it is not the option for the Adjudicating Authority to allow or not to allow...

Imported goods classified under incorrect tariff heading, appellants denied opportunity for cross-examination and access to test reports, violation of natural justice...

Quick Updates: