Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2022 (11) TMI 1494

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... u/s. 143(3) of the Act. It was an inadvertent mistake which occurred at the end of the assessee in the filing of return where the claim of exemption was made u/s. 10(23C)(vi) of the Act instead of section 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act. It is also noted that upon receiving intimation u/s. 143(1) of the Act wherein the inadvertent claim made u/s. 10(23C)(vi) was disallowed and remedial measure was taken by the assessee by filing an application u/s. 154 for rectifying the mistake by making a claim under the correct section of sec. 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act. We note that assessee had been consistently claiming exemption u/s. 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act. Considering the ITAT Lucknow in the case of Desh Bharti public School Samiti [ 2022 (4) TMI 448 - .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... from 15.03.2020 to 28.02.2022 has been directed to be excluded for the purpose of limitation. Vide this order a further period of 90 days has been granted for providing the limitation from 01.03.2022. Accordingly, we condone the delay and proceed to adjudicate upon the matter. 3. Grounds raised by the assessee are reproduced as under: 1. FOR TIIAT the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-NFAC failed to appreciate that none of the conditions precedent existed and/or have been complied with and/or fulfilled by the Ld. Assistant Director of Income Tax. Centralized Processing Centre for not accepting the plea of the appellant u/s. 154 of the Income Tax Act. 1961 and the specious order dated 31-03-3022 passed thereunder is therefore ab init .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the Act dated 20.03.2020. Against the said processing, assessee moved an application of rectification u/s. 154 of the Act on 30.07.2020 by making a correction towards the claim of exemption u/s. 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act as against eligible claim made u/s. 10(23C)(vi) of the Act. The rectification application was rejected vide order dated 04.09.2020 against which assessee went in appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi who had upheld the rejection of the claim made by the assessee u/s. 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act vide its rectification application. 5. Before us, Shri Somnath Ghosh, Advocate represented the assessee and Shri G. H. Sema, CIT, DR represented the revenue. 6. Before us, Ld. Counsel submitted that there is no dispute on the fact .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... to correct the inadvertent mistake by making claim of exemption under the correct section of 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act which has been unjustifiably rejected. Thus, in view of all the above processing and assessment in the assessee s own case of the preceding as well as subsequent assessment years, Ld. Counsel emphasized that Rule of Consistency ought to be applied and there is no reason to deviate from the view which has already been taken. Since there is no change in the facts and the applicable law, there is no occasion for the ld. AO to take a different view from that adopted in the above referred proceeding. 6.2. Ld. Counsel also submitted that he had evidently demonstrated that the mistake is a mistake apparent from record which is rec .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ction 12A. 7. Per contra, the Ld. CIT, DR placed reliance on the order of the Ld. CIT(A). 8. We have heard the rival submissions, perused the material available on record and gone through the documents placed in the paper book referred by the Ld. Counsel. Admittedly, it is undisputed that assessee had been imparting education and has been claiming exemption u/s. 10(23C)(iiiab) of the Act which has been considered and allowed in the preceding as well as in the subsequent assessment years vis- -vis the impugned year under consideration either in the intimation issued u/s. 143(1) of the Act or assessment completed u/s. 143(3) of the Act. Ld. Counsel has evidently demonstrated that it was an inadvertent mistake which occurred at the end of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates