Penalty u/s 271-E - The Add. CIT ought to have been conscious of ...

Case Laws Income Tax

October 17, 2015

Penalty u/s 271-E - The Add. CIT ought to have been conscious of the limitation u/s 275(1)(c), i.e., that no order of penalty could have been passed u/s 271-E after the expiry of the financial year in which the quantum proceedings were completed or beyond six months after the month in which they were initiated, whichever was later. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271-E - The Add. CIT ought to have been conscious of ...

Case Laws Income Tax

October 17, 2015

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(a) - limitation to pass penalty order - Limitation, it goes without saying, has to be fixed and certain. Section 275(1A) speaks of giving effect to...

Penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - period of limitation - treatment of lease rent income - in the revised return, assessee claimed the same as income from house property to claim...

Assessment against an entity that had ceased to exist prior to the initiation of proceedings. The effect of a change in name was considered a curable defect u/s 292B, as...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Limitation period u/s 275(1)(a) -hile deciding the question of limitation as mentioned in the section, penalty order passed by the AO was...

Penalty under u/s 271(1)(c) - period of limitation - as per the proviso to section 275(1)(a) of the Act, the penalty order ought to have been passed on or before...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - limitation period u/s 275(1)(a) - limitation begins to run from the date of the order of the ITAT was served upon the CIT (Judicial) - penalty...

Penalty u/s 272A(2)(g) was levied for not issuing TDS certificates in Form 16A to deductees on time. The issue pertained to the period of limitation for issuing the...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice - non specification of charge - Notice as barred by limitation u/s 275 - mere non-acceptance of the explanation so...

Period of limitation for levy of penalty - Penalty proceedings u/s 271D - penalty order, was passed beyond the time period prescribed by Section 275(1)(c) - the same...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - scope of Section 275(1A) - once substantial question of law against quantum additions are admitted by Hon’ble HC u/s 260A, the tribunal shall...

Penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - limitation - service to CIT (Judicial) - the mandatory period of limitation u/s 275(1)(a) cannot be sought to be defeated by delaying the...

Application of section 275(1A) of income tax for deleting penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) - AO so consider the issue of imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) after giving...

Penalty u/s.271D & 271E - Period of limitation for imposing penalty u/s 275(1)(c) - he discussion by the AO in the assessment order and making reference to the Addl. CIT...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - combined order of penalty for additions made vide order u/s 143(3) r.w.s. u/s 153A and u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147 - AO required to initiate two...

The key points are regarding the penalty imposed u/s 271D read with Section 269SS, and the issue of whether the penalty orders were time-barred. The Assessing Officer...

Quick Updates: