Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - limitation period u/s 275(1)(a) - ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 25, 2019

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - limitation period u/s 275(1)(a) - limitation begins to run from the date of the order of the ITAT was served upon the CIT (Judicial) - penalty order in the present case to be barred by limitation

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - limitation period u/s 275(1)(a) - ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 25, 2019

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - limitation - service to CIT (Judicial) - the mandatory period of limitation u/s 275(1)(a) cannot be sought to be defeated by delaying the...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – Limitation period u/s 275(1)(a) -hile deciding the question of limitation as mentioned in the section, penalty order passed by the AO was...

Penalty under u/s 271(1)(c) - period of limitation - as per the proviso to section 275(1)(a) of the Act, the penalty order ought to have been passed on or before...

Levy of penalty u/s 271C - Period of limitation - In the present case, since penalty u/s 271C has not been initiated during the course of any proceedings, first part of...

Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice - non specification of charge - Notice as barred by limitation u/s 275 - mere non-acceptance of the explanation so...

Penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - period of limitation - treatment of lease rent income - in the revised return, assessee claimed the same as income from house property to claim...

Penalty u/s. 271E - period of limitation - There is no dispute that the period of limitation is required to be examined as per Section 275(1)(c) - it is futile to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(a) - limitation to pass penalty order - Limitation, it goes without saying, has to be fixed and certain. Section 275(1A) speaks of giving effect to...

Application of section 275(1A) of income tax for deleting penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) - AO so consider the issue of imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) after giving...

Penalty u/s 271-E - The Add. CIT ought to have been conscious of the limitation u/s 275(1)(c), i.e., that no order of penalty could have been passed u/s 271-E after the...

Penalty u/s 271-B – failure to get accounts audited u/s 44AB - penalty proceedings for the A.Y. 2000-01, 2001-02, 2002-03 & 2003-04 were initiated after the period of...

Period of limitation for levy of penalty - Penalty proceedings u/s 271D - penalty order, was passed beyond the time period prescribed by Section 275(1)(c) - the same...

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - scope of Section 275(1A) - once substantial question of law against quantum additions are admitted by Hon’ble HC u/s 260A, the tribunal shall...

Assessment against an entity that had ceased to exist prior to the initiation of proceedings. The effect of a change in name was considered a curable defect u/s 292B, as...

Penalty u/s 271E - period of limitation as prescribed u/s 275 (1)(c) - The appellant/revenue, as noticed above, cannot extend the period of limitation by deciding at its...

Quick Updates: