HC quashed penalty u/s 129(3) of UP GST Act for non-filling Part ...

Penalty u/s 129(3) of UP GST Act not justified for technical error in e-Way Bill. Orders quashed.

Case Laws GST

June 5, 2024

HC quashed penalty u/s 129(3) of UP GST Act for non-filling Part 'B' of e-Way Bill. Citing precedent, court found error technical, not tax evasion. Orders of Dec 26, 2020 & Nov 29, 2021 set aside, petition allowed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

HC quashed penalty u/s 129(3) of UP GST Act for non-filling Part ...

Penalty u/s 129(3) of UP GST Act not justified for technical error in e-Way Bill. Orders quashed.

Case Laws GST

June 5, 2024

You may also like:

Levy of Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 - Errors in e-way bills - The Court emphasized that minor typographical errors in e-way bills,...

Levy of penalty - at the time of detention was that one of the E-Way Bills had expired - The High court held that mens rea to evade tax is essential for imposing...

Detention of goods due to incomplete Part B of E-way bill. No dispute on documents/goods. Part B filled before notice/seizure order. No mens rea found to evade tax....

Imposition of tax and penalty u/s 129(3) - e-way bill had expired nine hours and thirty minutes prior to interception - The High court referred to previous cases where...

Levy of penalty - non filling up of Part 'B' of the e-Way Bill - existence of mens rea or not The High Court referenced a specific case and highlighted that the issue of...

Penalty u/s 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 - goods detained on the ground that the goods were being transported on a vehicle different from...

Levy of penalty for violation of section 129 and Rule 138 - Failure to update the E-way bill on change of vehicle after breakdown - The imposition of penalties for mere...

Detention of goods on onward journey - detention on ground goods dispatched to different place than mentioned in documents - levy of penalty u/s 129 of UPGST Act -...

Goods detained on ground of non-generation of E-Tax Invoice as per Rule 48 of GST Rules before movement; all required documents u/r 138A accompanied goods; technical...

Penalty order - wrongful mention of place of supply in E-Way bills - intent to evade tax or not - The High Court noted that the incorrect address mentioned in the E-Way...

Levy of Penalty order u/s 129(3) - Neither in the SCN nor in the order u/s 129(3) there was any allegation that non downloading of E-way Bill-02 was done with intention...

Petitioner challenged order passed u/s 129(3) of Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for alleged tax evasion due to typographical error in date on E-way Bill and Tax...

High Court held that since there was no intent to evade tax and the error in e-way bill was merely typographical, penalty imposed u/s 129(3) of CGST Act was unjustified....

Levy of penalty u/s 129(3) of the CGST Act, 2017 - petitioner has generated E-way bill by declaring the consignee as its additional place of business - intent to evade...

Levy of penalty - e-way bill had expired four days prior to the date of detention - existence of mens rea - The High Court found no evidence of intent to evade tax in...

Quick Updates: