2009 (1) TMI 174 - HC - Income Tax

The assessee had not paid advance tax on the interest income. The payer of interest had not deducted the tax held that We are clearly of the opinion that when a duty is cast on the payer to pay the tax at source, on failure, no interest can be imposed on the payee-assessee.

Summary

Issues:
Interpretation of Section 234B - Liability to pay advance tax when tax not deducted at source.

Analysis:
The primary issue in this case revolves around the interpretation of Section 234B of the Income-tax Act concerning the liability to pay advance tax when the tax is not deducted at the source. The crux of the matter is whether the assessee is liable to pay advance tax when the payer fails to deduct the tax at the source under Section 195 of the Act. The Tribunal upheld the assessee's contention that when the assessee is not liable to pay advance tax, interest under Section 234B cannot be charged. The Tribunal's findings emphasized that even though the assessee is assessable for income, it is not liable to pay advance tax if the tax is deductible by the payer but not actually deducted. This interpretation is crucial in determining the liability of the assessee in such situations.

Furthermore, the case references previous judgments to support the interpretation of the law. The Full Bench of the court under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, in the case of CIT v. Daimler Benz A. G., discussed the consequences of failure to pay advance tax by the assessee. The Full Bench concluded that the assessee would not be liable to pay interest on the advance tax not deducted. This historical perspective provides a legal basis for understanding the current issue at hand and the implications of non-deduction of tax at the source on the assessee's liability.

Moreover, the judgment in CIT v. Sedco Forex International Drilling Co. Ltd. by the Uttaranchal High Court is pivotal in this case. The court held that interest cannot be levied on the assessee under Section 234B for tax not liable to be deducted at the source. This decision forms the basis for subsequent rulings in similar cases, emphasizing that the duty to pay tax at the source lies with the payer, and failure to do so does not warrant interest imposition on the payee-assessee. The court's reliance on this precedent highlights the consistency in legal interpretation across different cases and jurisdictions.

In alignment with the precedent set by the Uttaranchal High Court, the court in this case concurred with the view that no interest can be imposed on the payee-assessee when the duty to pay tax at the source lies with the payer. The court's agreement with the interpretation in CIT v. Sedco Forex International Drilling Co. Ltd. solidifies the legal position that the failure of the payer to deduct tax at the source does not automatically shift the liability to pay advance tax and interest to the assessee. Consequently, after considering the submissions of both parties and the provisions of the law, the court dismissed the appeal, affirming the assessee's position in the matter.