Clandestine removal - cross examination of witnesses - It is ...

Case Laws Central Excise

November 24, 2017

Clandestine removal - cross examination of witnesses - It is required for the departmental adjudicating authorities to first admit the statements in evidence in accordance in the procedure prescribed in Section 9D before the same can be used against asseesse even in departmental proceedings. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine removal - cross examination of witnesses - It is ...

Case Laws Central Excise

November 24, 2017

You may also like:

Clandestine removal of excisable goods alleged based on statements recorded from partners, employees, and buyers. Section 9D of Central Excise Act mandates...

Clandestine Removal - As per the provisions of section 9D it is clear that during adjudication, the adjudicating authority is required to first examine the witness in...

Principles of natural justice - request for cross examination of panch-witnesses and of departmental officers has been rejected - the allegations of Show Cause Notice...

Clandestine removal - denial of opportunity of cross-examination of witnesses - The only question is at what stage would he be entitled to cross-examine the witnesses -...

Dishonor of Cheque - seeking cross examination of the complainant officer of the bank - In the present application the recall, re-cross examination of the complainant is...

Principles of natural justice - rejection of cross-examination - The petitioner has approached this Court prematurely as the respondents have only rejected the request...

Regulation 17 of CBLR, 2018 prescribes procedure for revoking license or imposing penalty. Department relied upon statements of witnesses. Right of cross-examination...

Denial of cross-examination process of witness - ACIT restricted cross examination process by denying the questions asked by the Petitioner during cross examination -...

Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by...

This case pertains to an alleged offense under FEMA involving bogus purported exports with inflated invoices to obtain export benefits, where the goods never reached the...

Clandestine removal - cross-examination of persons whose statements were relied upon - As per Section 9D, the provisions are clear that, before relying on the statement...

The case pertains to the allegation of clandestine manufacture and clearance of structural items/rolled products by the appellant. The revenue's case rested solely on...

Levy of penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 on the owners of the seized goods - Allegation that, pulses (URAD ki Dal) in question were meant for illegal export from...

Clandestine removal - consumption of electricity - the charge of clandestine removal is to be established on examination of facts of each case and not merely on the...

The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the rejection of the petitioner's request for cross-examination in a matter...

Quick Updates: