Assessment u/s 153A - Bogus LTCG - statement recorded in search ...

High Court Upholds ITAT Decision: Section 153A Additions Deleted Due to Lack of Cross-Examination, Section 153C Violations.

March 1, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Assessment u/s 153A - Bogus LTCG - statement recorded in search action against a third person - the Assessee had no opportunity to cross-examine the said witness, but that apart, the mandatory procedure under section 153C has not been followed - ITAT rightly deleted the additions - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Assessment u/s 153A - Bogus LTCG - statement recorded in search ...

High Court Upholds ITAT Decision: Section 153A Additions Deleted Due to Lack of Cross-Examination, Section 153C Violations.

March 1, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

Reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147 were quashed by ITAT for violation of principles of natural justice due to lack of opportunity for cross-examination of...

ITAT overturned multiple additions made by AO regarding property transactions and unexplained cash receipts. On capital gains computation under s.50C, ITAT directed...

The assessment reopening u/s 147 read with Section 148 was found to be unsustainable due to the lack of independent application of mind by the Commissioner of Income Tax...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

The CIT(A) partly allowed and restricted the addition on account of commission expenses at 0.25% as compared to 2% adopted by the Assessing Officer. The coordinate bench...

The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the rejection of the petitioner's request for cross-examination in a matter...

Customs broker's license revocation order set aside due to lack of evidence for alleged violations. Key findings: no proof of misdeclaration or undervaluation to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

The ITAT Indore addressed unexplained cash investment for property purchase post search operation. Addition without cross-examination was challenged. The Tribunal...

Addition u/s 68 OR 41(1) - unexplained cash credit - Cessation of liability - The appellant contested additions to their income, alleging bogus sundry creditors. Despite...

Addition u/s 69A - cash loans given by the assessee as unexplained - decoding of the entries in the seized materials - The tribunal found that the assessing officer's...

Addition of unexplained cash credit u/s 68 - bank account can’t be loosely called as books of account u/s 68 - ITAT can’t covert the addition from section 68 to section...

Protective addition made by Assessing Officer was not sustainable as substantive addition did not survive in concluded assessment proceedings of related party. CIT(A)...

The Appellate Tribunal held that the addition u/s 56(2)(vii) or 28(iv) was unjustified, as the purchase was made with consideration, cheques were given to sellers with...

Quick Updates: